Bail Out of Silicon Valley Bank Depositors is an Outrage
Woke speculators have bought off our politicians
March 12, 2023
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) just went belly up and America’s ruling class choreographed a taxpayer-backed bailout of wealthy depositors consisting of venture capitalists, internet start-up speculators, climate change grifters, wine makers, woke activists and media giants such as Roku.
This was done without Congressional approval. Our corporate overlords and Wall Street grifters learned during the 2008 financial meltdown that letting grubby Americans have a say in bailing out their financial shenanigans was bad for business and paid off our politicians to change the law. Unelected bureaucrats like Treasury Secretary Janet Yellin, who ordered this bail out, now call the shots.
First some background. SVB is the sixteenth largest bank and is located in northern California, where many tech start-ups originate. Banks often specialize in different areas. For example, a bank in the Midwest may specialize in loans to farmers. A Texas bank may specialize in lending to oil companies.
SVB specialized in internet start-ups. But their lending to these start-ups was limited. Most start-ups are financed by venture capitalists. This is a coalition of wealthy investors who give money to internet entrepreneurs in return for stock or a partnership in the company in the hope of reaping a bonanza if the company is successful. These internet start-ups and venture capitalists then placed their money in SVB.
Now SVB could have conservatively invested this money in liquid assets such as the money market. But instead, their avaricious executives chose to buy long-term bonds because they offer higher returns. For example, let’s say SVB purchased bonds two years ago of ten years duration that paid 2% interest. The bond would pay 2% annually and then when the time period of the bond expired, SVB is returned all the money it paid for the bond.
The problem is that the word got out that many of these internet start-ups were burning cash and producing nothing and the bank’s depositors started withdrawing their money – what is called a bank run. SVB did not have the money available to pay these depositors unless it sold the bonds it purchased. But since interest rates have spiked recently, these bonds have lost value.
For example, if SVB had a large portfolio of $100,000 10-year bonds paying 2% that it purchased two years ago, it can’t sell them for $100,000 each because the interest rates are higher (bond values decrease when interest rates rise). SVB may only receive in the area of $85,000 for each bond. This means they can’t reimburse their depositors.
The federal government only insures each depositor for $250,000. No more. That’s the law. But in America, the law only applies to the politically powerless. Only 7% of the deposits were under this threshold. The uber wealthy had much higher deposits in this bank. And now they are all getting their money back thanks to the backing of the the American taxpayer.
Large banks and Wall Street firms can speculate at will and when their investments go south, they get bailed out. But some homeowner who loses his job and can’t make his mortgage payment is heaved out onto the street by a man with a gun when his house is repossessed by the bank.
The CEO of SVB, Gregory Becker, made over $9,922,000 in 2021. And a week before SVB went belly up, he sold some SVB stock valued at $3,600,000. Large bonuses were made to executives immediately before the news leaked the bank was going belly up.
Now it should be mentioned in all fairness that the SVB stockholders and bond holders (I’ll believe this when I see it) are not going to be bailed out. But since the executives have already absconded with the cash, they are still ahead of the game.
And what will happen to these crooks. If you said “Absolutely nothing,” go to the head of the class.
This incident highlights the real reason the ruling class led by billionaires such as Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter executives manipulated the 2020 election to remove Donald Trump. As president, Trump would have never allowed this outrage. But they knew the feckless Biden would.
It is time for the Republican Party to show some spine. Donald Trump, Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis need to publicly attack this plan for what it is – another kick in the face to hard working Americans.
Thank you for the example you provided. A few points: The "bailout" funds are not taxpayer backed from what the Treasury has stated. Of course, their intent now is meaningless if the contagion spreads.
In my view, Trump also would have allowed this "bailout". This is the "D.C. Uniparty" doing what they do best. Due to the speed that a decision was needed yesterday, Congress was not involved. Ultimately this is a moral question - Should customers lose millions of dollars through no fault of their own? The depositors did not make the bad investment decisions of SVB. Their management needs to pay, not the depositors.
I suppose you could argue that they took unnecessary risks by placing more than $250,000 in their accounts. I agree in principle, but when real life intervenes doing the right thing is more important than abstract principles.
As stated in the Wall St. Journal: "The Treasury and Federal Reserve stepped in late Sunday to contain the financial damage from Friday’s closure of Silicon Valley Bank, guaranteeing even uninsured deposits and offering loans to other banks so they don’t have to take losses on their fixed-income assets. This is a de facto bailout of the banking system, even as regulators and Biden officials have been telling us that the economy is great and there was nothing to worry about. The unpleasant truth—which Washington will never admit—is that SVB’s failure is the bill coming due for years of monetary and regulatory mistakes."
So what ever happened to "moral hazard?" Haven't we learned the lessons of Bear Stearns, which ended up failing anyway even after a bailout? At the very least, the salaries and stock sales of SVB's execs should be clawed back.